Daniel Milavsky vs Tristan Mccormick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Aug at 09:59 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Milavsky vs T. Mccormick

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Milavsky 2 - 0 Mccormick
They have played 4 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 4 and Tristan Mccormick winning 0. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Tristan Mccormick was at the M25 Idanha-a-Nova, 17-08-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milavsky | 2 |
| Mccormick | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(F) M25 Idanha-a-Nova(08-17-25)
(QF) M15 Tallahassee(11-22-24)
D. Milavsky vs T. Mccormick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 67.74% (63-30) | Career Total W/L | 55.87% (138-109) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Milavsky vs T. Mccormick Match Preview:
- Milavsky's recent form indicates a slightly lesser second serve performance at 46.82%, compared to Mccormick's 47.07%. Could this small difference impact the outcome?
- When it comes to returning second serves, Milavsky shows a slight edge, winning 46.11% of points compared to Mccormick's 45.06%.
- Analyzing players under pressure, Milavsky saves 56.2% of breakpoints, whereas Mccormick has a better record at 59.81%.
- In the past year, Milavsky has shown superior match performance, winning 74.55% of his matches, while Mccormick has a 56.96% win rate.
- Milavsky excels on indoor hard surfaces with an 80% win rate, while Mccormick's best surface appears to be grass, holding a 67% win rate.
- Both players compete mainly at the $10K level, but Milavsky has a stronger win rate of 78.72% compared to Mccormick's 58.93%.
- In their direct encounters, Milavsky has a perfect record against Mccormick, winning their only match decisively.
- Match length in their encounters averages 71 minutes, with no deciding sets or tiebreak situations played thus far.
- Milavsky tends to win 58% of deciding sets against all opponents, while Mccormick wins 56%, signifying Milavsky's slight edge in crucial moments.
- Both players faced opponents of similar average rankings over the past year, showing comparable competition levels.
- For breakpoints, Milavsky has a slight advantage, converting 30.99% compared to Mccormick's 29.03%.
Editorial Prediction (August 17, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Milavsky and Mccormick present an intriguing contest. Milavsky exhibits a moderately stronger match win ratio over the past year and prefers indoor hard surfaces where he has shown formidable results.
While Mccormick demonstrates a slightly better second serve win percentage, Milavsky compensates with superior breakpoint conversion and historical success in their head-to-head matchup.
Their past encounter indicates Milavsky is typically more dominant. Given his consistent record and proficiency under deciding set conditions, Milavsky appears the more likely victor in the forthcoming match against Mccormick.
Daniel Milavsky vs Tristan Mccormick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Milavsky vs T. Mccormick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 15 |
| 16 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:44 | Average Match Time | 1:35:44 |
| 72% (78/109) | 1st Serve % | 64% (77/121) |
| 83% (65/78) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (54/77) |
| 52% (16/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 39% (47/121) | Return Points Win % | 26% (28/109) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played
T. Mccormick Recent Matches Played

D. Milavsky vs T. Mccormick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.74% (63/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.87% (138/109) |
| 63.18% (139/81) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.50% (315/263) |
| 55.29% (1166/943) | Games Win/Loss | 51.82% (2954/2746) |
| 66.13% (41/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.00% (54/46) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.02% (65/49) |
| 79.17% (19/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 425 | Aces Total | 1506 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 284 | Total Double Faults | 892 |
| 1:32:19 | Average Match Time | 1:43:22 |
| 369.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.54 |
| 61% (3340/5500) | 1st Serve % | 59% (9031/15282) |
| 72% (2406/3340) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (6665/9031) |
| 52% (1122/2160) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3168/6252) |
| 41% (235/578) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (534/1400) |
| 40% (2247/5590) | Return Points Win % | 37% (5832/15713) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Challenger W/L | 41.38% (24/34) |
| 72.60% (53/20) | Futures W/L | 60.32% (114/75) |
| 67% (60/90) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (137/244) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (11/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (56/104) |
| 57% (20/35) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (48/87) |
| 90% (59/53) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (132/112) |
| 8% (59/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (132/20) |
| 26% (34/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (115/26) |